Found 4290 related files. Current in page 1
MS-Excel is just an application which allows one do your sales, to produce spreadsheets, execute fundamental numerical and mathematical evaluation on considerable amounts of information, and provide your data.
Work the Runway in your Fashion Model attire. The Fashion Model outfit can be any "dress up" outfit you would wear to a social occasion, party, wedding, red carpet event, etc.
220 Pages Report] Refrigerant Market report categorizes the Global Market by Product Type [Hydro Chlorofluorocarbon (HCFC), Hydro fluorocarbon (HFC), Hydrocarbon (HC), Inorganic (Ammonia, Carbon dioxide)], Application & by Geography
Global Automotive Components is one of the most prominent Cylinder Heads manufacturing company in India.Global caters to a broad spectrum of application such as cylinder head specialist manufacturer tractors, Trucks, Locomotives, Stationery Engines and Heavy Earthmoving equipments
Please check the part-number(s) for your application against the part-number(s) listed on the instruction sheet. DO NOT USE ANY WASHERS with ARP Flywheel Bolts. They are designed to be installed without them. Note: ARP will NOT be responsible for any failures resulting from using a washer with this kit. Make sure there is an adequate chamfer around the bolt holes on the flywheel to clear the radius under the head of the bolt. Lubricate the threads of the bolt with LOCTITE 242 and the under head of the bolt with ARP ULTRATORQUE FASTENER ASSEMBLY LUBRICANT. Then install the flywheel onto the crankshaft and tighten the bolts hand tight. Using an alternating or criss cross pattern, torque the bolts to 95 ft lbs using the specified lubricants in Step 4. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact us at (805) 339-2200 or by FAX at (805) 650-0742 Flywheel Bolt without Washer- Installation
In this paper, we examine a number of SQL and socalled “NoSQL” data stores designed to scale simple OLTP-style application loads over many servers. Originally motivated by Web 2.0 applications, these systems are designed to scale to thousands or millions of users doing updates as well as reads, in contrast to traditional DBMSs and data warehouses. We contrast the new systems on their data model, consistency mechanisms, storage mechanisms, durability guarantees, availability, query support, and other dimensions. These systems typically sacrifice some of these dimensions, e.g. database-wide transaction consistency, in order to achieve others, e.g. higher availability and scalability. Note: Bibliographic references for systems are not listed, but URLs for more information can be found in the System References table at the end of this paper. Caveat: Statements in this paper are based on sources and documentation that may not be reliable, and the systems described are “moving targets,” so some statements may be incorrect. Verify through other sources before depending on information here. Nevertheless, we hope this comprehensive survey is useful! Check for future corrections on the author’s web site cattell.net/datastores. Disclosure: The author is on the technical advisory board of Schooner Technologies and has a consulting business advising on scalable databases.
As companies deal with ever larger amounts of data and increasingly demanding workloads, a new class of databases has taken hold. Dubbed “NoSQL”, these databases trade some of the features used by traditional relational databases in exchange for increased performance and/or partition tolerance. But as NoSQL solutions have proliferated and differentiated themselves (into key-value stores, document databases, graph databases, and “NewSQL”), trying to evaluate the database landscape for a particular class of problem becomes more and more difficult. In this paper we attempt to answer this question for one specific, but critical, class of functionality – applications that need the highest possible raw performance for a reliable storage engine. There have been a few attempts to provide standardized tools to measure performance or other characteristics, but these have been hobbled by the lack of a clear mandate on exactly what they’re testing, plus an inability to measure load at the highest volumes. In addition, there is an implicit tradeoff between the consistency and durability requirements of an application and the maximum throughput that can be processed. What is needed is not an attempt to quantify every NoSQL solution into one artificial bucket, but a more systemic analysis of how some of these databases can achieve under assumptions that mirror real-world application needs. We attempted to provide a comprehensive answer to one specific set of use cases for NoSQL databases -- consumer-facing applications which require extremely high throughput and low latency, and whose information can be represented using a key-value schema. In particular, we look at two common scenarios.
CUSTOMER TESTIMONIAL: FRONT PORCH DIGITAL’S RAPID APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT Front Porch Digital, Inc. is a world leader in digital asset workflow management serving global leaders in the entertainment industry. Front Porch Digital recently integrated Stretchr into its application development processes. “Stretchr has fundamentally changed the way we approach data systems development. Today’s data comes in so many shapes and sizes and is always changing, requiring you to spend a huge amount of time designing and editing schemas in traditional databases or developing expertise in NoSQL technology. With Stretchr all of that time and complexity goes away. You simply acquire the data, from any source and in any form. Stretchr then organizes the data for you based on how your users consume it – it couldn’t be simpler. Our first integration with Stretchr took an afternoon, and was effectively the insertion of one line of code into our existing application. So happy are we with the way Stretchr works and performs that we are tightly integrating our newest products with Stretchr, cutting development times significantly”.
that is deduced directly from the structure of the program even in the absence of any explicit type declaration or annotation. We present a calculus for processing semistructured data that spans differences of application area among several novel query languages, broadly categorized as “NoSQL”. This calculus lets users deﬁne their own operators, capturing a wider range of data processing capabilities, whilst providing a typing precision so far typical only of primitive hard-coded operators. The type inference algorithm is based on semantic type checking, resulting in type information that is both precise, and ﬂexible enough to handle structured and semistructured data. We illustrate the use of this calculus by encoding a large fragment of Jaql, including operations and iterators over JSON, embedded SQL expressions, and co-grouping, and show how the encoding directly yields a typing discipline for Jaql as it is, namely without the addition of any type deﬁnition or type annotation in the code.