SEARCH

Found 1732 related files. Current in page 10

Macam macam microssof office dan pengertiannya

1967 kb/s - Macam Macam Microssof Office Dan Pengertiannya Full Download


2157 kb/s - [Verified] Macam Macam Microssof Office Dan Pengertiannya


2864 kb/s - Macam Macam Microssof Office Dan Pengertiannya Direct Download

Qualify Medical Services
by best420card 0 Comments favorite 36 Viewed Download 0 Times

All of the patient records are protected by doctor-patient confidentiality. We WILL NOT release your records to anyone, unless you come into our office and request a release of records. We follow strict HIPAA guidelines to ensure patient privacy. All patient records and discussions are kept in the strictest confidentiality.

Stair Safety: A Review of the Literature and Data Concerning Stair ...

Prepared for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research Washington, D.C. 20410 Instrument No. DU100K000005897 by NAHB Research Center Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 November 30, 1992 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the NAHB Research Center under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The Principal Investigator for this study was Phillip Davis. Internal technical review was provided by David Dacquisto and Mark Nowak. Contributing analysts were Mark Gibson and Tom Levin. We would like to gratefully acknowledge the care and diligence exercised by Dr. Carol Meeks who provided external review on the major studies, and to William Freeborne, government technical representative of HUD.

Theology and Harry Potter
by Rowling 0 Comments favorite 9 Viewed Download 0 Times

Christian Theology and Harry Potter EXP-0005-F Fall, 2013 Danielle Elizabeth Tumminio, Instructor Instructor Contact Information: E-mail: danielle.tumminio@yale.edu Office Hours: By appointment. *E-mail is the best way to reach me. I promise to respond in a timely manner. Course Description: Is Dumbledore a God-figure, or is he Merlin recreated in our times? Is he neither because the Harry Potter books are just a children’s series intended for entertainment rather than allusion to other literary works? Is the reading of theological archetypes into Rowling’s series present or imposed upon the text? To start thinking about these questions, our class is going to look at a whole range of ideas from Christian theology that together create the underpinnings of what Christians think about God, and we will then look at them alongside the Harry Potter books. The central goal of this course is to ask whether the Harry Potter books espouse a Christian theological worldview, and if so, to what extent. Our study may show that they do. It may reveal that they do not. Regardless of the outcome, it will be our task to probe this question in detail. In order to accomplish this goal of the class, we will look at voices from all sides of the debate, from Christians opposed to the books to those in favor of them to atheists who believe the series has nothing whatsoever to do with religion, never mind Christianity specifically. We will analyze their arguments before undertaking our own study of the theology of the books. We will discuss topics such as how an all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful God can allow evil (theodicy), how sin relates to salvation (soteriology), and the significance of sacrifice. We will read theological sources on such topics while reading—or for many of us, re-reading—the Harry Potter books, so that we may bring these topics into direct discussion with Rowling’s work. By the end of the course, we should be able to better analyze to what end Rowling uses topics...

Lowest Interest Rates Mortgage
by hanovermtg 0 Comments favorite 22 Viewed Download 0 Times

In May of 1998, when Colin Philbrick realized the need for a mortgage company that put its clients first, they founded Hanover Mortgage Company. Since their humble beginnings in a Greenville City Airport Office with only one other employee, they’ve grown to more than ten strong and have their own office building off of Wade Hampton Boulevard.

To promote innovation the proper balance of competition and patent

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy A Report by the Federal Trade Commission October 2003 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION TIMOTHY J. MURIS MOZELLE W. THOMPSON ORSON SWINDLE THOMAS B. LEARY PAMELA JONES HARBOUR Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Susan A. Creighton J. Howard Beales III Luke Froeb William E. Kovacic Anna H. Davis Rosemarie A. Straight Director, Bureau of Competition Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection Director, Bureau of Economics General Counsel Director, Office of Congressional Relations Executive Director Report Contributors Susan S. DeSanti, Deputy General Counsel for Policy Studies, Office of the General Counsel William E. Cohen, Assistant General Counsel for Policy Studies, Office of the General Counsel Gail F. Levine, Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Policy Studies, Office of the General Counsel Hillary J. Greene, Project Director for Intellectual Property, Office of the General Counsel Matthew Bye, Attorney, Policy Studies, Office of General Counsel Michael S. Wroblewski, Assistant General Counsel for Policy Studies, Office of the General Counsel Robin Moore, formerly Attorney, Policy Studies, Office of General Counsel Michael Barnett, formerly Attorney, Policy Studies, Office of General Counsel Nicole Gorham, Legal Assistant, Policy Studies, Office of General Counsel Cecile Kohrs, Legal Assistant, Policy Studies, Office of General Counsel David Scheffman, formerly Director, Bureau of Economics Mark Frankena, Associate Director for Competition Analysis, Bureau of Economics Roy Levy, Economist, Economic Policy Analysis, Bureau of Economics Alden F. Abbott, Assistant Director for Policy and Evaluation, Bureau of Competition Suzanne Michel, Special Counsel for Intellectual Property, Bureau of Competition Paige Pidano, formerly Legal Assistant, Bureau of Competition Karina Lubell, formerly Legal Assistant, Bureau of Competition Inquiries concerning this report should be directed to: Susan S. DeSanti, Deputy General Counsel for Policy Studies, Office of the General Counsel (202) 326-3190 or sdesanti@ftc.gov

Provisional Application for Patent Cover Sheet - United States ...

USE ONLY FOR FILING A PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENT This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.51. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.11 and 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 10 hours to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313‐1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313‐1450. If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1‐800‐PTO‐9199 and select option 2. PTO/SB/16 (03‐13) Approved for use through 01/31/2014. OMB 0651‐0032 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENT COVER SHEET – Page 2 of 2 The invention was made by an agency of the United States Government or under a contract with an agency of the United States Government. No. Yes, the invention was made by an agency of the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government agency name is: __________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Yes, the invention was made under a contract with an agency of the U.S. Government. The name of the U.S. Government agency and Government contract number are: ____________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Tags: Politics, Patent,
Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013

A bill to promote transparency in patent ownership and make other improvements to the patent system, and for other purposes. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES llllllllll Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. LEE, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on llllllllll A BILL A bill to promote transparency in patent ownership and make other improvements to the patent system, and for other purposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 5 ‘‘Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013’’. 6 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for 7 this Act is as follows: Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. 1. 2. 3. 4. Short title; table of contents. Definitions. Transparency of patent ownership. Customer stay. ALB13912 S.L.C. 2 Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Bad-faith demand letters. Small business education, outreach, and information access. Improved post-issuance procedures. Protection of intellectual-property licenses in bankruptcy. Codification of the double-patenting doctrine for first-inventor-to-file patents. Sec. 10. Technical corrections to the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. Sec. 11. Reports. Sec. 12. Effective date. 1 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 2 In this Act: 3 (1) DIRECTOR.—The term ‘‘Director’’ means 4 the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual 5 Property and Director of the United States Patent 6 and Trademark Office. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (2) OFFICE.—The term ‘‘Office’’ means the United States Patent and Trademark Office. SEC. 3. TRANSPARENCY OF PATENT OWNERSHIP. (a) JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 281 of title 35, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking ‘‘A patentee’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—A patentee’’; and (B) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(b) INITIAL DISCLOSURE.—The court shall require...

A Guide to Filing A Design Patent Application

A design consists of the visual ornamental characteristics embodied in, or applied to, an article of manufacture. Since a design is manifested in appearance, the subject matter of a design patent application may relate to the configuration or shape of an article, to the surface ornamentation applied to an article, or to the combination of configuration and surface ornamentation. A design for surface ornamentation is inseparable from the article to which it is applied and cannot exist alone. It must be a definite pattern of surface ornamentation, applied to an article of manufacture. In discharging its patent-related duties, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or Office) examines applications and grants patents on inventions when applicants are entitled to them. The patent law provides for the granting of design patents to any person who has invented any new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture. A design patent protects only the appearance of the article and not structural or utilitarian features. The principal statutes (United States Code) governing design patents are:...

Changes To Implement the Patent Law Treaty - U.S. Government ...

Changes To Implement the Patent Law Treaty United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012 (PLTIA) amends the patent laws to implement the provisions of the Hague Agreement Concerning International Registration of Industrial Designs (Hague Agreement) in title I, and the Patent Law Treaty (PLT) in title II. The PLT harmonizes and streamlines formal procedures pertaining to the filing and processing of patent applications. This final rule revises the rules of practice for consistency with the changes in the PLT and title II of the PLTIA. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) is implementing the Hague Agreement and title I of the PLTIA in a separate rulemaking. The notable changes in the PLT and title II of the PLTIA pertain to: The filing date requirements for a patent application; the restoration of patent rights via the revival of abandoned applications and acceptance of delayed maintenance fee payments; and the restoration of the right of priority to a ...

Tags: Patent, Politics,
Top 300 Organizations Granted U.S. Patents in 2012 - Intellectual ...

IPO does not attempt to answer the question above. IPO publishes patent owner lists as an information service for IPO members. This list of organizations that received the most U.S. utility patents is being published by IPO for the 30th consecutive year. It is based on data obtained from the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Patents granted to parent and subsidiary companies are combined in some instances. See the end notes for more information. IPO makes reasonable efforts to avoid errors, but cannot guarantee accuracy. June 19, 2013 2012 Patent Owners Numerical Listing Use care in interpreting the “percent change from 2011” column. The total number of patents granted by the USPTO in 2012 was 253,155, up 12.8 percent from 2011. The percent change for an individual organization could be affected by mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, inconsistent treatment of subsidiaries in 2011 and 2012, and many other factors.

 67891011121314